("Har-Mar Collisions"), appeals from a judgment of the Mobile Circuit Court ("the trial court") following a jury verdict of $101,054.40 in favor of Har-Mar Collisions on its breach-of-contract claim against Scottsdale Insurance Company ("Scottsdale"). Scottsdale Insurance Company _ 1141267 _ Scottsdale Insurance Company v. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2015-2016 _ 1141230 _ Har-Mar Collisions, Inc. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 2290649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. Rel: Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. The trial court was affirmed in all other respects. The Court remanded for the trial court to reconsider Har-Mar Collisions' motion to tax costs. ![]() After review, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment to the extent it applied a setoff against the jury verdict returned against Scottsdale and remanded the case for the trial court to enter a judgment reinstating the jury verdict of $101,054.40. ![]() Scottsdale cross-appealed from the judgment against it. Har-Mar Collisions appeals, challenging the setoff. Because the total amount Har-Mar Collisions recovered from those two settlement agreements exceeded the amount of the jury verdict, the trial court entered a judgment awarding Har-Mar Collisions $0. ![]() The trial court offset the jury verdict by the amounts Har-Mar Collisions had recovered from a settlement agreement it had entered into with Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Owners Insurance Company and from a settlement agreement it had entered into with CRC Insurance Services, Inc. appealed a circuit court judgment after a jury verdict of $101,054.40 in favor of Har-Mar Collisions on its breach-of-contract claim against Scottsdale Insurance Company.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |